Calculatingā€¦

Clinical Research Metadata Model Version 1.0

Unlock the potential behind knowledge laden in clinical articles based on our advanced metadata analysis. From understanding treatment efficacy to predicting disease progression, our comprehensive model provides the insights to drive innovation and optimize therapeutic strategies in drug discovery.

Digital Asset for Clinical Research Metadata Model version 1.0

AttributeDescriptionData TypeExample Values
StudyDesignMethodology and type of studyTextObservational, Randomized Controlled Trial
DiseaseStateCondition or disease being studiedTextDiabetes, Heart Disease
TreatmentTreatment(s) under investigation including controlsTextDrug A, Surgical Procedure B
TreatmentGroupHow patients are grouped based on treatment receivedTextDrug A vs. Placebo, Pre-op vs. Post-op
GenderBreakdown of study participants by genderCategoricalMale, Female, Other
DosageDosages of treatment(s) administeredText50mg daily, 100mg twice daily
SubjectPopulationCharacteristics of the study populationTextAges 18-65, diverse ethnicities
ComorbiditiesOther medical conditions present in the study populationTextHypertension, Obesity
HealthcareUtilizationUse of healthcare services during the studyTextNumber of hospital visits, medication use
SocioeconomicFactorsSocioeconomic data relevant to the populationTextIncome level, Education level
TreatmentPatternsReal-world use of treatments, including combinationsTextSequential use of Drug A then B
DrugInteractionsKnown or observed interactions between treatments and other medicationsTextDrug A interacts with Drug B
CostEffectivenessTreatment cost in relation to its effectivenessTextCost per QALY, direct and indirect costs
GenomicBiomarkerDataGenomic information or biomarkers used for treatment responseTextPresence of Biomarker X
DiseaseProgressionProgression of the disease in the study populationTextStages of disease progression
EnvironmentalLifestyleFactorsLifestyle factors impacting healthTextDiet, Physical activity levels
PatientSatisfactionPreferencesFindings on patient satisfaction or care preferencesTextSatisfaction scores, treatment preference
CochraneRiskOfBiasScoreThe Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in the results of the studyScore (0-7)Low, High, Unclear
NewcastleOttawaScaleA star system used to judge the quality of non-randomized studies based on three broad perspectives: the selection of the study groups; the comparability of the groups; and the ascertainment of either the exposure or outcome of interest for case-control or cohort studies respectively.Score (0-9)5 stars, 7 stars